Historic Post Office Default August 1


us-postal-serviceWhile lawmakers continue to fight over how to fix the ailing U.S. Postal Service, the agency’s money problems are only growing worse.

The Postal Service repeated on Wednesday that without congressional action, it will default-a first in its long history, a spokesman said-on a legally required annual $5.5 billion payment, due Aug. 1, into a health-benefits fund for future retirees. Action in Congress isn’t likely, as the House prepares to leave for its August recess.

The agency said a default on the payment, for 2011, wouldn’t directly affect service or its ability to pay employees and suppliers. But “these ongoing liquidity issues unnecessarily undermine confidence in the viability of the Postal Service among our customers,” said spokesman David Partenheimer.

The agency says it will default on its 2012 retiree health payment as well-also roughly $5.5 billion, due Sept. 30-if there is no legislative action by then.

Most everyone agrees the Postal Service needs an overhaul. It had a loss of $3.2 billion in the second quarter of this fiscal year; it is to report third-quarter results on Aug. 9. The agency blames factors including declining mail volumes and the unusual 2006 mandate by Congress that it annually set aside billions for future retirees. But while the Senate has passed legislation to overhaul the agency, the House says it doesn’t expect to take up its own proposal until after August.

The two sides remain far apart. Senators voted in April, on a bipartisan basis, for legislation that largely shores up the agency’s finances by returning an estimated $10.9 billion overpayment made into the federal employee pension system. The legislation limits the agency’s ability to close postal branches and stop Saturday delivery.

Republican House leaders support legislation they say would require the agency to operate more like a business, in part by setting up a panel to reduce the network of post offices. Some rural-district House members, from both parties, have been worried about closures in their areas.

A chief backer of the House bill, Rep. Dennis Ross (R., Fla.), wouldn’t consider financial relief in the Senate bill “absent wholesale reforms” that are in the House bill, said Fredrick Piccolo Jr., chief of staff for Mr. Ross. He said that there will “in all likelihood be no vote before the August recess.”

The office of Sen. Tom Carper (D., Del.), one of the authors of the Senate bill, said Wednesday that “every day that is lost in passing reform legislation puts the Postal Service another step closer to collapse, and unfortunately it appears that House Leaders are prepared to let that happen.”


{Matzav.com Newscenter}


  1. Let’s see – they want to operate the post office more like a business. We heard that a long time ago. It was spun off as an independent agency to be more like a business. So what happened? Obviously, it didn’t work. If you look at the failure rate for businesses – it’s pretty high. And if these guys can make a $10.9 BILLION overpayment to the pension fund, they’re obviously not doing their bookkeeping straight.

    When I was a kid the post office was a government agency and it worked – next day delivery for all local mail, etc. Maybe we should bring it back under governmental supervision. “Privatization” obviously isn’t Working here.

    And cutting services isn’t going to help. That’s why people are opting for FedEx. And by the way – how many congressmen on the committee have ties to FedEx or UPS? Nowadays, you have to ask.

Leave a Reply to Oldtimer Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here